In February 2023, Lewes District Council passed a motion to explore development of Rights of Rivers for the River Ouse, two years later the council passed a motion to support and champion the Rights of the River Ouse Charter: this was the first time an English council had successfully recognised the rights of rivers in a charter (though it certainly wasn’t the first attempt, as early as 2018 Frome Town Council applied to enact a byelaw which proposed granting the Rodden Meadows and River Frome legal personality). To date around 20 councils and parish councils have passed motions to recognise rights of rivers (including catchment and ecosystems) and trees. Recently Maidstone Borough Council formally adopted a Rights of Nature framework paving the way for it to “embed the principle that nature has an intrinsic right to exist, thrive and evolve across its governance, decision‑making and service delivery”. Most recently, in July 2026, Cambridge City Council recognised the Rights of the River Cam and the residents of Greater Cambridge asked for a permanent voting seat for the Voice of the River on the board of the Greater Cambridge Development Corporation.
Related: EU Market Insights: Key Trends
The charter development is a uniquely contemporary demonstration of a grass-roots, non-partisan driven approach to the development of custom and practice, or put another way, the emergence of customary law. As we all know, customary law is generally considered to be a body of unwritten rules and practices that have evolved over time, widely adopted – with the potential to be codified. This not unusual and echoes the ancient beliefs held by many local and indigenous peoples. As Monica Feria-Tinta noted in her book ‘A Barrister for the Earth’, this belief that nature should be respected and its essential processes should not be impaired was also enshrined in the United Nations World Charter for Nature in 1982 (with the UK voting in favour).
Related: Think tank urges regulation of litigation funding
Passing the charter is just the first step – albeit one that requires a lot of time and work. Once a council has passed a charter the next step is integrating the rights into the existing patchwork of statutory duties and policies that they work within. We have our charter, what’s next? Generally, council motions have recognised the right to flow, to be free from pollution, to sustain their ecosystems, to be fed by and feed sustainable aquifers and to regeneration and restoration. Many of them also include a right for rivers to be represented (or similar concepts of stewardship or guardianship): this right has no parallel in existing environmental law so needs some thought as to how to achieve it. We set out a number of ideas as to how representation or guardianship might be achieved in our Rights of Rivers Guide. But in practice, we have seen councils appointing Nature Champions and River Champions or nominating councillors to speak at meetings on behalf of nature. We have also seen a number of community groups experimenting with Interspecies Councils (where participants each represent a different species from a river bringing a unique perspective of, for example, a kingfisher). Once a charter is in place and the rights are recognised, there is a need to move from paper to action to ensure that they are abiding by their motions and also to meet the expectations of constituents who have mandated them to implement rights of nature. Against a background of local council restructuring and devolution, many councils are now:· integrating rights into their decision-making processes by amending local plans and climate and nature strategies or creating a framework which overlays decision-making;· investigating when nature can be considered as a ‘material consideration’ for decision-making on planning; · reviewing procurement policies and criteria for suppliers to reference rights of nature or rivers; and· considering many other novel ways to reflect a change of perspective in the consideration of nature in decision-making.